Belarus vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Belarus
9,357 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
South Africa
10,818 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Belarus rank
75th
South Africa rank
72nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Belarus
  • South Africa
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199120082025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 10,818 constant 2015 US$ against 9,357 constant 2015 US$ in Belarus, a difference of 1,461 constant 2015 US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 75th and South Africa ranks 72nd of 175 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 2,461 constant 2015 US$ 4,230 constant 2015 US$ 1,769 constant 2015 US$ South Africa
2000s 3,787 constant 2015 US$ 5,954 constant 2015 US$ 2,168 constant 2015 US$ South Africa
2010s 7,086 constant 2015 US$ 9,557 constant 2015 US$ 2,472 constant 2015 US$ South Africa
2020s 8,332 constant 2015 US$ 10,725 constant 2015 US$ 2,393 constant 2015 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Belarus or South Africa?
South Africa, at 10,818 constant 2015 US$ against 9,357 constant 2015 US$ in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Belarus and South Africa?
1,461 constant 2015 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Belarus ranks 75th and South Africa ranks 72nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/belarus/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/belarus/south-africa/">Belarus vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.