Bahamas vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Bahamas
46,901 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
New Zealand
55,088 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Bahamas rank
17th
New Zealand rank
14th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Bahamas
  • New Zealand
20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 55,088 constant 2015 US$ against 46,901 constant 2015 US$ in Bahamas, a difference of 8,187 constant 2015 US$.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 175 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 22,004 constant 2015 US$ 35,061 constant 2015 US$ 13,057 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2000s 25,358 constant 2015 US$ 43,184 constant 2015 US$ 17,826 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2010s 26,948 constant 2015 US$ 49,598 constant 2015 US$ 22,650 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2020s 36,623 constant 2015 US$ 50,634 constant 2015 US$ 14,010 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Bahamas or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 55,088 constant 2015 US$ against 46,901 constant 2015 US$ in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Bahamas and New Zealand?
8,187 constant 2015 US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Bahamas ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/bahamas-the/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/bahamas-the/new-zealand/">Bahamas vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.