Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Azerbaijan
2,755 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Sri Lanka
3,334 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
125th
Sri Lanka rank
122nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Sri Lanka
1.0k2.0k3.0k199120082025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 3,334 constant 2015 US$ against 2,755 constant 2015 US$ in Azerbaijan, a difference of 579 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Azerbaijan's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 125th and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 175 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 861.86 constant 2015 US$ 1,642 constant 2015 US$ 780.21 constant 2015 US$ Sri Lanka
2000s 1,480 constant 2015 US$ 1,661 constant 2015 US$ 180.22 constant 2015 US$ Sri Lanka
2010s 1,991 constant 2015 US$ 2,852 constant 2015 US$ 860.73 constant 2015 US$ Sri Lanka
2020s 2,581 constant 2015 US$ 3,215 constant 2015 US$ 634.76 constant 2015 US$ Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Azerbaijan or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 3,334 constant 2015 US$ against 2,755 constant 2015 US$ in Azerbaijan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
579 constant 2015 US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Azerbaijan ranks 125th and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/azerbaijan/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/azerbaijan/sri-lanka/">Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.