Africa Eastern and Southern vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Africa Eastern and Southern
938.03 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Montenegro
19,315 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
45th
Montenegro rank
48th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Montenegro
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199120082025

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 19,315 constant 2015 US$ against 938.03 constant 2015 US$ in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 18,377 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 20.6 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 45th and Montenegro ranks 48th of 46 groups.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 804.68 constant 2015 US$ 11,116 constant 2015 US$ 10,311 constant 2015 US$ Montenegro
2010s 901.24 constant 2015 US$ 14,782 constant 2015 US$ 13,880 constant 2015 US$ Montenegro
2020s 938.23 constant 2015 US$ 16,848 constant 2015 US$ 15,910 constant 2015 US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Africa Eastern and Southern or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 19,315 constant 2015 US$ against 938.03 constant 2015 US$ in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Africa Eastern and Southern and Montenegro?
18,377 constant 2015 US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Montenegro?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Montenegro rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 45th and Montenegro ranks 48th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/africa-eastern-and-southern/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/africa-eastern-and-southern/montenegro/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.