Africa Eastern and Southern vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Africa Eastern and Southern
938.03 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Japan
20,324 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
45th
Japan rank
46th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Japan
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199120082025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 20,324 constant 2015 US$ against 938.03 constant 2015 US$ in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 19,386 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Japan's figure about 21.7 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 45th and Japan ranks 46th of 46 groups.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 765.15 constant 2015 US$ 15,218 constant 2015 US$ 14,453 constant 2015 US$ Japan
2000s 804.68 constant 2015 US$ 17,796 constant 2015 US$ 16,992 constant 2015 US$ Japan
2010s 901.24 constant 2015 US$ 19,009 constant 2015 US$ 18,108 constant 2015 US$ Japan
2020s 938.27 constant 2015 US$ 19,088 constant 2015 US$ 18,150 constant 2015 US$ Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Africa Eastern and Southern or Japan?
Japan, at 20,324 constant 2015 US$ against 938.03 constant 2015 US$ in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Africa Eastern and Southern and Japan?
19,386 constant 2015 US$, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Japan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Japan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 45th and Japan ranks 46th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/africa-eastern-and-southern/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/africa-eastern-and-southern/japan/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.