Afghanistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Afghanistan
1,153 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
855.37 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
158th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
161st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05001.0k1.5k199120082025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 1,153 constant 2015 US$ against 855.37 constant 2015 US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 297.63 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.3 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 158th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st of 175 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 1,002 constant 2015 US$ 645.84 constant 2015 US$ 355.94 constant 2015 US$ Afghanistan
2010s 1,218 constant 2015 US$ 791.11 constant 2015 US$ 427.14 constant 2015 US$ Afghanistan
2020s 1,223 constant 2015 US$ 838.92 constant 2015 US$ 384.42 constant 2015 US$ Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Afghanistan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Afghanistan, at 1,153 constant 2015 US$ against 855.37 constant 2015 US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Afghanistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
297.63 constant 2015 US$, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Afghanistan ranks 158th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/afghanistan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/afghanistan/tanzania/">Afghanistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.