Slovenia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Slovenia
1.15 billion current LCU
in 2025
Palestine, State of
884.20 million current LCU
in 2024
Slovenia rank
164th
Palestine, State of rank
167th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Slovenia
  • Palestine, State of
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B1.2B199420092025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 1.15 billion current LCU against 884.20 million current LCU in Palestine, State of, a difference of 267.65 million current LCU.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.3 times Palestine, State of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Slovenia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 164th and Palestine, State of ranks 167th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 2 and Palestine, State of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 476.72 million current LCU 438.50 million current LCU 38.22 million current LCU Slovenia
2000s 638.75 million current LCU 497.18 million current LCU 141.57 million current LCU Slovenia
2010s 738.14 million current LCU 1.07 billion current LCU 328.47 million current LCU Palestine, State of
2020s 923.02 million current LCU 1.03 billion current LCU 105.16 million current LCU Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Slovenia or Palestine, State of?
Slovenia, at 1.15 billion current LCU against 884.20 million current LCU in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Slovenia and Palestine, State of?
267.65 million current LCU, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Palestine, State of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Slovenia and Palestine, State of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Slovenia ranks 164th and Palestine, State of ranks 167th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/slovenia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/slovenia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Slovenia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.