Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Saudi Arabia
124.02 billion current LCU
in 2025
Zimbabwe
154.25 billion current LCU
in 2025
Saudi Arabia rank
86th
Zimbabwe rank
84th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zimbabwe
050.0B100.0B150.0B196519952025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 154.25 billion current LCU against 124.02 billion current LCU in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 30.23 billion current LCU.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 206 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 961.50 million current LCU 118,381 current LCU 961.38 million current LCU Saudi Arabia
1970s 2.06 billion current LCU 247,687 current LCU 2.06 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
1980s 13.03 billion current LCU 422,270 current LCU 13.03 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
1990s 30.52 billion current LCU 452,829 current LCU 30.52 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
2000s 39.32 billion current LCU 393,580 current LCU 39.32 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
2010s 68.22 billion current LCU 3.74 million current LCU 68.21 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
2020s 105.41 billion current LCU 39.22 billion current LCU 66.19 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 154.25 billion current LCU against 124.02 billion current LCU in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
30.23 billion current LCU, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2025.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Saudi Arabia ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/">Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.