Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Papua New Guinea
20.20 billion current LCU
in 2024
Zambia
29.79 billion current LCU
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
114th
Zambia rank
111th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zambia
010.0B20.0B30.0B196019922025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 29.79 billion current LCU against 20.20 billion current LCU in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 9.59 billion current LCU.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.5 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 111th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 141.27 million current LCU 96,611 current LCU 141.17 million current LCU Papua New Guinea
1970s 337.56 million current LCU 240,610 current LCU 337.32 million current LCU Papua New Guinea
1980s 753.07 million current LCU 2.32 million current LCU 750.75 million current LCU Papua New Guinea
1990s 1.84 billion current LCU 527.38 million current LCU 1.31 billion current LCU Papua New Guinea
2000s 4.97 billion current LCU 4.97 billion current LCU 3.82 million current LCU Papua New Guinea
2010s 10.63 billion current LCU 10.65 billion current LCU 19.77 million current LCU Zambia
2020s 18.13 billion current LCU 13.93 billion current LCU 4.21 billion current LCU Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
Zambia, at 29.79 billion current LCU against 20.20 billion current LCU in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
9.59 billion current LCU, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Papua New Guinea ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 111th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/papua-new-guinea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/papua-new-guinea/zambia/">Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.