Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Myanmar
43.39 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
52.48 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Myanmar rank
13th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
11th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Myanmar
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0T40.0T60.0T199020072025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 52.48 trillion current LCU against 43.39 trillion current LCU in Myanmar, a difference of 9.09 trillion current LCU.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Myanmar ranks 13th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th of 206 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 6.28 trillion current LCU 5.32 trillion current LCU 959.88 billion current LCU Myanmar
2010s 18.71 trillion current LCU 24.45 trillion current LCU 5.74 trillion current LCU Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 32.11 trillion current LCU 44.32 trillion current LCU 12.21 trillion current LCU Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Myanmar or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 52.48 trillion current LCU against 43.39 trillion current LCU in Myanmar as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
9.09 trillion current LCU, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Myanmar ranks 13th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/myanmar/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/myanmar/tanzania/">Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.