Mexico vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Mexico
1.37 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Thailand
1.66 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Mexico rank
55th
Thailand rank
53rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Mexico
  • Thailand
0500.0B1.0T1.5T196019922025

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 1.66 trillion current LCU against 1.37 trillion current LCU in Mexico, a difference of 290.26 billion current LCU.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 55th and Thailand ranks 53rd of 206 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 38.83 million current LCU 35.27 billion current LCU 35.23 billion current LCU Thailand
1970s 134.17 million current LCU 78.26 billion current LCU 78.13 billion current LCU Thailand
1980s 8.82 billion current LCU 191.22 billion current LCU 182.40 billion current LCU Thailand
1990s 117.43 billion current LCU 365.71 billion current LCU 248.28 billion current LCU Thailand
2000s 303.97 billion current LCU 689.49 billion current LCU 385.52 billion current LCU Thailand
2010s 609.22 billion current LCU 1.31 trillion current LCU 704.86 billion current LCU Thailand
2020s 1.16 trillion current LCU 1.52 trillion current LCU 366.58 billion current LCU Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Mexico or Thailand?
Thailand, at 1.66 trillion current LCU against 1.37 trillion current LCU in Mexico as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Mexico and Thailand?
290.26 billion current LCU, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Thailand?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Mexico and Thailand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Mexico ranks 55th and Thailand ranks 53rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/mexico/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/mexico/thailand/">Mexico vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.