Mauritius vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Mauritius
34.31 billion current LCU
in 2025
Zambia
29.79 billion current LCU
in 2025
Mauritius rank
108th
Zambia rank
111th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zambia
010.0B20.0B30.0B196019922025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 34.31 billion current LCU against 29.79 billion current LCU in Zambia, a difference of 4.52 billion current LCU.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 108th and Zambia ranks 111th of 206 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 1.02 billion current LCU 339,700 current LCU 1.02 billion current LCU Mauritius
1980s 2.11 billion current LCU 2.32 million current LCU 2.11 billion current LCU Mauritius
1990s 5.92 billion current LCU 527.38 million current LCU 5.39 billion current LCU Mauritius
2000s 9.53 billion current LCU 5.01 billion current LCU 4.51 billion current LCU Mauritius
2010s 12.93 billion current LCU 10.65 billion current LCU 2.28 billion current LCU Mauritius
2020s 23.22 billion current LCU 16.57 billion current LCU 6.65 billion current LCU Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Mauritius or Zambia?
Mauritius, at 34.31 billion current LCU against 29.79 billion current LCU in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Mauritius and Zambia?
4.52 billion current LCU, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Mauritius ranks 108th and Zambia ranks 111th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/mauritius/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/mauritius/zambia/">Mauritius vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.