Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Malaysia
166.21 billion current LCU
in 2025
Zimbabwe
154.25 billion current LCU
in 2025
Malaysia rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
84th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Malaysia
  • Zimbabwe
050.0B100.0B150.0B196019922025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 166.21 billion current LCU against 154.25 billion current LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 11.96 billion current LCU.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 206 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 3.17 billion current LCU 113,163 current LCU 3.17 billion current LCU Malaysia
1970s 7.02 billion current LCU 247,687 current LCU 7.02 billion current LCU Malaysia
1980s 15.27 billion current LCU 422,270 current LCU 15.26 billion current LCU Malaysia
1990s 27.00 billion current LCU 452,829 current LCU 27.00 billion current LCU Malaysia
2000s 48.15 billion current LCU 393,580 current LCU 48.15 billion current LCU Malaysia
2010s 101.30 billion current LCU 3.74 million current LCU 101.30 billion current LCU Malaysia
2020s 148.29 billion current LCU 39.22 billion current LCU 109.07 billion current LCU Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
Malaysia, at 166.21 billion current LCU against 154.25 billion current LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
11.96 billion current LCU, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Malaysia ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/malaysia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/malaysia/zimbabwe/">Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.