Malaysia vs Morocco: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Malaysia
166.21 billion current LCU
in 2025
Morocco
179.85 billion current LCU
in 2025
Malaysia rank
82nd
Morocco rank
80th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Malaysia
  • Morocco
050.0B100.0B150.0B200.0B196019922025

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 179.85 billion current LCU against 166.21 billion current LCU in Malaysia, a difference of 13.64 billion current LCU.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Morocco ahead.

Malaysia ranks 82nd and Morocco ranks 80th of 206 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 3.17 billion current LCU 3.44 billion current LCU 270.36 million current LCU Morocco
1970s 7.02 billion current LCU 7.04 billion current LCU 22.61 million current LCU Morocco
1980s 15.27 billion current LCU 19.83 billion current LCU 4.56 billion current LCU Morocco
1990s 27.00 billion current LCU 51.24 billion current LCU 24.24 billion current LCU Morocco
2000s 48.15 billion current LCU 70.93 billion current LCU 22.79 billion current LCU Morocco
2010s 101.30 billion current LCU 117.55 billion current LCU 16.25 billion current LCU Morocco
2020s 148.29 billion current LCU 153.29 billion current LCU 5.00 billion current LCU Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Malaysia or Morocco?
Morocco, at 179.85 billion current LCU against 166.21 billion current LCU in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Malaysia and Morocco?
13.64 billion current LCU, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Morocco?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Malaysia and Morocco rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Malaysia ranks 82nd and Morocco ranks 80th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Morocco: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/malaysia/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/malaysia/morocco/">Malaysia vs Morocco: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.