Malawi vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Malawi
7.84 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Russian Federation
6.55 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Malawi rank
29th
Russian Federation rank
30th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Malawi
  • Russian Federation
02.0T4.0T6.0T8.0T198020022025

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 7.84 trillion current LCU against 6.55 trillion current LCU in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.29 trillion current LCU.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 29th and Russian Federation ranks 30th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1980s 2.15 billion current LCU 89.40 million current LCU 2.06 billion current LCU Malawi
1990s 10.59 billion current LCU 86.81 billion current LCU 76.22 billion current LCU Russian Federation
2000s 169.53 billion current LCU 946.02 billion current LCU 776.49 billion current LCU Russian Federation
2010s 1.02 trillion current LCU 2.74 trillion current LCU 1.73 trillion current LCU Russian Federation
2020s 4.43 trillion current LCU 5.39 trillion current LCU 955.98 billion current LCU Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Malawi or Russian Federation?
Malawi, at 7.84 trillion current LCU against 6.55 trillion current LCU in Russian Federation as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Malawi and Russian Federation?
1.29 trillion current LCU, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Russian Federation?
37 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
How do Malawi and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Malawi ranks 29th and Russian Federation ranks 30th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/malawi/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/malawi/russian-federation/">Malawi vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.