Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Latvia
1.73 billion current LCU
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1.35 billion current LCU
in 2024
Latvia rank
158th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
161st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Latvia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196619952025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1.73 billion current LCU against 1.35 billion current LCU in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 379.65 million current LCU.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Latvia ranks 158th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 161st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 270.58 million current LCU 769.06 million current LCU 498.48 million current LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 498.50 million current LCU 651.97 million current LCU 153.47 million current LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 849.83 million current LCU 1.28 billion current LCU 431.40 million current LCU Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 1.51 billion current LCU 1.44 billion current LCU 70.80 million current LCU Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Latvia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Latvia, at 1.73 billion current LCU against 1.35 billion current LCU in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
379.65 million current LCU, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Latvia ranks 158th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 161st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/latvia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/latvia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.