Kyrgyzstan vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Kyrgyzstan
158.10 billion current LCU
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
124.02 billion current LCU
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
83rd
Saudi Arabia rank
86th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Saudi Arabia
050.0B100.0B150.0B196819962025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 158.10 billion current LCU against 124.02 billion current LCU in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 34.08 billion current LCU.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 86th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1980s 11.45 million current LCU 21.47 billion current LCU 21.46 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
1990s 6.64 billion current LCU 30.52 billion current LCU 23.88 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
2000s 31.16 billion current LCU 39.32 billion current LCU 8.16 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
2010s 57.09 billion current LCU 68.22 billion current LCU 11.13 billion current LCU Saudi Arabia
2020s 118.07 billion current LCU 105.41 billion current LCU 12.66 billion current LCU Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Kyrgyzstan or Saudi Arabia?
Kyrgyzstan, at 158.10 billion current LCU against 124.02 billion current LCU in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia?
34.08 billion current LCU, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia?
38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Saudi Arabia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 86th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/kyrgyz-republic/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/kyrgyz-republic/saudi-arabia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.