Republic of Korea vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Republic of Korea
39.00 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Sudan
39.09 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Republic of Korea rank
16th
Sudan rank
15th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • Sudan
010.0T20.0T30.0T40.0T196019922025

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 39.09 trillion current LCU against 39.00 trillion current LCU in Republic of Korea, a difference of 88.60 billion current LCU.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Republic of Korea ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 15th of 206 countries.

Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea Sudan Difference Ahead
1960s 306.85 billion current LCU 206,500 current LCU 306.85 billion current LCU Republic of Korea
1970s 2.71 trillion current LCU 637,210 current LCU 2.71 trillion current LCU Republic of Korea
1980s 9.90 trillion current LCU 10.09 million current LCU 9.90 trillion current LCU Republic of Korea
1990s 20.93 trillion current LCU 4.01 billion current LCU 20.92 trillion current LCU Republic of Korea
2000s 25.27 trillion current LCU 28.66 billion current LCU 25.24 trillion current LCU Republic of Korea
2010s 31.43 trillion current LCU 174.54 billion current LCU 31.26 trillion current LCU Republic of Korea
2020s 35.72 trillion current LCU 12.58 trillion current LCU 23.14 trillion current LCU Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Republic of Korea or Sudan?
Sudan, at 39.09 trillion current LCU against 39.00 trillion current LCU in Republic of Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Republic of Korea and Sudan?
88.60 billion current LCU, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Sudan?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Republic of Korea and Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Republic of Korea ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 15th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/korea-rep/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/korea-rep/sudan/">Republic of Korea vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.