Kenya vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Kenya
4.07 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Rwanda
4.75 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Kenya rank
42nd
Rwanda rank
40th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Kenya
  • Rwanda
01.0T2.0T3.0T4.0T5.0T196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 4.75 trillion current LCU against 4.07 trillion current LCU in Kenya, a difference of 677.51 billion current LCU.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Rwanda ahead.

Kenya ranks 42nd and Rwanda ranks 40th of 206 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 2.89 billion current LCU 9.58 billion current LCU 6.69 billion current LCU Rwanda
1970s 8.20 billion current LCU 24.38 billion current LCU 16.18 billion current LCU Rwanda
1980s 28.31 billion current LCU 62.16 billion current LCU 33.85 billion current LCU Rwanda
1990s 139.37 billion current LCU 153.11 billion current LCU 13.74 billion current LCU Rwanda
2000s 369.12 billion current LCU 473.16 billion current LCU 104.04 billion current LCU Rwanda
2010s 1.31 trillion current LCU 1.43 trillion current LCU 127.36 billion current LCU Rwanda
2020s 3.13 trillion current LCU 3.46 trillion current LCU 325.86 billion current LCU Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Kenya or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 4.75 trillion current LCU against 4.07 trillion current LCU in Kenya as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Kenya and Rwanda?
677.51 billion current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Rwanda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Kenya ranks 42nd and Rwanda ranks 40th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/kenya/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/kenya/rwanda/">Kenya vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.