Iceland vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Iceland
181.09 billion current LCU
in 2025
South Africa
216.08 billion current LCU
in 2025
Iceland rank
79th
South Africa rank
78th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Iceland
  • South Africa
050.0B100.0B150.0B200.0B196019922025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 216.08 billion current LCU against 181.09 billion current LCU in Iceland, a difference of 35.00 billion current LCU.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 79th and South Africa ranks 78th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 46.14 billion current LCU 24.17 billion current LCU 21.97 billion current LCU Iceland
2000s 61.71 billion current LCU 45.00 billion current LCU 16.71 billion current LCU Iceland
2010s 118.22 billion current LCU 93.66 billion current LCU 24.56 billion current LCU Iceland
2020s 164.54 billion current LCU 178.48 billion current LCU 13.94 billion current LCU South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Iceland or South Africa?
South Africa, at 216.08 billion current LCU against 181.09 billion current LCU in Iceland as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Iceland and South Africa?
35.00 billion current LCU, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Iceland and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Iceland ranks 79th and South Africa ranks 78th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/iceland/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/iceland/south-africa/">Iceland vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.