Honduras vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Honduras
136.89 billion current LCU
in 2025
Malaysia
166.21 billion current LCU
in 2025
Honduras rank
85th
Malaysia rank
82nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Honduras
  • Malaysia
050.0B100.0B150.0B196019922025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 166.21 billion current LCU against 136.89 billion current LCU in Honduras, a difference of 29.32 billion current LCU.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Honduras ranks 85th and Malaysia ranks 82nd of 206 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 392.95 million current LCU 2.91 billion current LCU 2.52 billion current LCU Malaysia
1970s 749.81 million current LCU 7.02 billion current LCU 6.27 billion current LCU Malaysia
1980s 1.69 billion current LCU 15.27 billion current LCU 13.58 billion current LCU Malaysia
1990s 8.51 billion current LCU 27.00 billion current LCU 18.49 billion current LCU Malaysia
2000s 21.98 billion current LCU 48.15 billion current LCU 26.16 billion current LCU Malaysia
2010s 54.58 billion current LCU 101.30 billion current LCU 46.73 billion current LCU Malaysia
2020s 96.84 billion current LCU 148.29 billion current LCU 51.45 billion current LCU Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Honduras or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 166.21 billion current LCU against 136.89 billion current LCU in Honduras as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Honduras and Malaysia?
29.32 billion current LCU, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Malaysia?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Honduras and Malaysia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Honduras ranks 85th and Malaysia ranks 82nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/honduras/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/honduras/malaysia/">Honduras vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.