Guatemala vs Mauritania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Guatemala
90.46 billion current LCU
in 2025
Mauritania
92.73 billion current LCU
in 2025
Guatemala rank
92nd
Mauritania rank
90th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mauritania
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B100.0B196119932025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 92.73 billion current LCU against 90.46 billion current LCU in Guatemala, a difference of 2.27 billion current LCU.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 92nd and Mauritania ranks 90th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 419.11 million current LCU 333.41 million current LCU 85.69 million current LCU Guatemala
1970s 1.02 billion current LCU 658.59 million current LCU 365.36 million current LCU Guatemala
1980s 3.39 billion current LCU 1.77 billion current LCU 1.62 billion current LCU Guatemala
1990s 19.83 billion current LCU 7.05 billion current LCU 12.79 billion current LCU Guatemala
2000s 27.54 billion current LCU 16.14 billion current LCU 11.40 billion current LCU Guatemala
2010s 46.27 billion current LCU 42.51 billion current LCU 3.76 billion current LCU Guatemala
2020s 73.68 billion current LCU 74.79 billion current LCU 1.11 billion current LCU Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Guatemala or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 92.73 billion current LCU against 90.46 billion current LCU in Guatemala as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Guatemala and Mauritania?
2.27 billion current LCU, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mauritania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and Mauritania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Guatemala ranks 92nd and Mauritania ranks 90th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mauritania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/guatemala/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/guatemala/mauritania/">Guatemala vs Mauritania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.