Gambia vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Gambia
44.37 billion current LCU
in 2025
Sierra Leone
49.96 billion current LCU
in 2025
Gambia rank
101st
Sierra Leone rank
98th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Gambia
  • Sierra Leone
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B196419942025

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 49.96 billion current LCU against 44.37 billion current LCU in Gambia, a difference of 5.58 billion current LCU.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 101st and Sierra Leone ranks 98th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 27.76 million current LCU 87,450 current LCU 27.68 million current LCU Gambia
1970s 65.09 million current LCU 205,795 current LCU 64.88 million current LCU Gambia
1980s 290.86 million current LCU 5.57 million current LCU 285.28 million current LCU Gambia
1990s 1.41 billion current LCU 310.70 million current LCU 1.10 billion current LCU Gambia
2000s 6.79 billion current LCU 2.66 billion current LCU 4.13 billion current LCU Gambia
2010s 13.94 billion current LCU 11.74 billion current LCU 2.20 billion current LCU Gambia
2020s 30.36 billion current LCU 36.27 billion current LCU 5.91 billion current LCU Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Gambia or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 49.96 billion current LCU against 44.37 billion current LCU in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Gambia and Sierra Leone?
5.58 billion current LCU, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Sierra Leone?
60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do Gambia and Sierra Leone rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Gambia ranks 101st and Sierra Leone ranks 98th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/gambia-the/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/gambia-the/sierra-leone/">Gambia vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.