Faroe Islands vs Solomon Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Faroe Islands
4.49 billion current LCU
in 2024
Solomon Islands
3.98 billion current LCU
in 2024
Faroe Islands rank
141st
Solomon Islands rank
144th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Solomon Islands
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B199020072024

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 4.49 billion current LCU against 3.98 billion current LCU in Solomon Islands, a difference of 508.55 million current LCU.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 141st and Solomon Islands ranks 144th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 1.30 billion current LCU 800.95 million current LCU 497.00 million current LCU Faroe Islands
2000s 1.41 billion current LCU 1.26 billion current LCU 156.97 million current LCU Faroe Islands
2010s 2.72 billion current LCU 3.43 billion current LCU 705.13 million current LCU Solomon Islands
2020s 4.07 billion current LCU 4.06 billion current LCU 14.58 million current LCU Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Faroe Islands or Solomon Islands?
Faroe Islands, at 4.49 billion current LCU against 3.98 billion current LCU in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Faroe Islands and Solomon Islands?
508.55 million current LCU, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Solomon Islands?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Faroe Islands and Solomon Islands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Faroe Islands ranks 141st and Solomon Islands ranks 144th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Solomon Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/faroe-islands/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/faroe-islands/solomon-islands/">Faroe Islands vs Solomon Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.