Eritrea vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time
- Eritrea
- Greenland
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 4.03 billion current LCU against 3.79 billion current LCU in Greenland, a difference of 237.10 million current LCU.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Greenland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Greenland ahead.
Eritrea ranks 143rd and Greenland ranks 146th of 206 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Eritrea or Greenland?
- Eritrea, at 4.03 billion current LCU against 3.79 billion current LCU in Greenland as of 2009.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Eritrea and Greenland?
- 237.10 million current LCU, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Greenland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2009.
- How do Eritrea and Greenland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
- Eritrea ranks 143rd and Greenland ranks 146th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.