Equatorial Guinea vs United States of America: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Equatorial Guinea
239.30 billion current LCU
in 2025
United States of America
223.72 billion current LCU
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
75th
United States of America rank
77th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • United States of America
100.0B150.0B200.0B250.0B199720112025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 239.30 billion current LCU against 223.72 billion current LCU in United States of America, a difference of 15.57 billion current LCU.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times United States of America's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 75th and United States of America ranks 77th of 206 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 80.03 billion current LCU 147.41 billion current LCU 67.38 billion current LCU United States of America
2010s 137.39 billion current LCU 187.11 billion current LCU 49.72 billion current LCU United States of America
2020s 185.47 billion current LCU 211.78 billion current LCU 26.31 billion current LCU United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Equatorial Guinea or United States of America?
Equatorial Guinea, at 239.30 billion current LCU against 223.72 billion current LCU in United States of America as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Equatorial Guinea and United States of America?
15.57 billion current LCU, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and United States of America?
16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and United States of America rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 75th and United States of America ranks 77th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs United States of America: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/equatorial-guinea/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/equatorial-guinea/united-states/">Equatorial Guinea vs United States of America: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.