El Salvador vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

El Salvador
1.62 billion current LCU
in 2025
Oman
1.18 billion current LCU
in 2025
El Salvador rank
160th
Oman rank
163rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • El Salvador
  • Oman
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196119932025

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 1.62 billion current LCU against 1.18 billion current LCU in Oman, a difference of 432.68 million current LCU.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.4 times Oman's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 160th and Oman ranks 163rd of 206 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Oman Difference Ahead
1960s 371.34 million current LCU 14.68 million current LCU 356.66 million current LCU El Salvador
1970s 795.22 million current LCU 21.91 million current LCU 773.31 million current LCU El Salvador
1980s 1.04 billion current LCU 88.81 million current LCU 946.96 million current LCU El Salvador
1990s 927.71 million current LCU 138.72 million current LCU 788.99 million current LCU El Salvador
2000s 943.02 million current LCU 204.32 million current LCU 738.70 million current LCU El Salvador
2010s 1.35 billion current LCU 481.26 million current LCU 866.42 million current LCU El Salvador
2020s 1.49 billion current LCU 942.73 million current LCU 545.90 million current LCU El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, El Salvador or Oman?
El Salvador, at 1.62 billion current LCU against 1.18 billion current LCU in Oman as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between El Salvador and Oman?
432.68 million current LCU, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Oman?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Oman rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
El Salvador ranks 160th and Oman ranks 163rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/el-salvador/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/el-salvador/oman/">El Salvador vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.