Egypt vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Egypt
3.00 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Sri Lanka
2.74 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Egypt rank
48th
Sri Lanka rank
49th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Egypt
  • Sri Lanka
01.0T2.0T3.0T196019922025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 3.00 trillion current LCU against 2.74 trillion current LCU in Sri Lanka, a difference of 263.11 billion current LCU.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Egypt ranks 48th and Sri Lanka ranks 49th of 206 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 528.72 million current LCU 2.56 billion current LCU 2.03 billion current LCU Sri Lanka
1970s 1.48 billion current LCU 8.06 billion current LCU 6.58 billion current LCU Sri Lanka
1980s 7.06 billion current LCU 42.08 billion current LCU 35.02 billion current LCU Sri Lanka
1990s 31.59 billion current LCU 152.87 billion current LCU 121.28 billion current LCU Sri Lanka
2000s 80.49 billion current LCU 350.73 billion current LCU 270.23 billion current LCU Sri Lanka
2010s 309.41 billion current LCU 895.34 billion current LCU 585.93 billion current LCU Sri Lanka
2020s 1.38 trillion current LCU 2.06 trillion current LCU 675.60 billion current LCU Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Egypt or Sri Lanka?
Egypt, at 3.00 trillion current LCU against 2.74 trillion current LCU in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Egypt and Sri Lanka?
263.11 billion current LCU, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sri Lanka?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Sri Lanka rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Egypt ranks 48th and Sri Lanka ranks 49th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/egypt-arab-rep/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/egypt-arab-rep/sri-lanka/">Egypt vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.