Chile vs Madagascar: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Chile
11.74 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Madagascar
19.29 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Chile rank
24th
Madagascar rank
23rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Chile
  • Madagascar
05.0T10.0T15.0T20.0T196019922025

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 19.29 trillion current LCU against 11.74 trillion current LCU in Chile, a difference of 7.55 trillion current LCU.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.6 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Madagascar ahead.

Chile ranks 24th and Madagascar ranks 23rd of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 3.59 million current LCU 10.94 billion current LCU 10.93 billion current LCU Madagascar
1970s 14.16 billion current LCU 25.64 billion current LCU 11.48 billion current LCU Madagascar
1990s 1.91 trillion current LCU 1.47 trillion current LCU 441.19 billion current LCU Chile
2000s 2.61 trillion current LCU 3.50 trillion current LCU 891.10 billion current LCU Madagascar
2010s 5.90 trillion current LCU 8.59 trillion current LCU 2.69 trillion current LCU Madagascar
2020s 9.71 trillion current LCU 15.12 trillion current LCU 5.41 trillion current LCU Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Chile or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 19.29 trillion current LCU against 11.74 trillion current LCU in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Chile and Madagascar?
7.55 trillion current LCU, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Madagascar?
45 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do Chile and Madagascar rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Chile ranks 24th and Madagascar ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Madagascar: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/chile/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/chile/madagascar/">Chile vs Madagascar: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.