Chile vs Lebanon: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Chile
11.74 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Lebanon
24.29 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Chile rank
24th
Lebanon rank
21st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Chile
  • Lebanon
05.0T10.0T15.0T20.0T25.0T196019922025

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 24.29 trillion current LCU against 11.74 trillion current LCU in Chile, a difference of 12.55 trillion current LCU.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 2.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 24th and Lebanon ranks 21st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Lebanon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lebanon Difference Ahead
1990s 1.89 trillion current LCU 1.42 trillion current LCU 471.42 billion current LCU Chile
2000s 2.61 trillion current LCU 1.63 trillion current LCU 981.21 billion current LCU Chile
2010s 5.90 trillion current LCU 2.48 trillion current LCU 3.42 trillion current LCU Chile
2020s 9.30 trillion current LCU 11.03 trillion current LCU 1.74 trillion current LCU Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Chile or Lebanon?
Lebanon, at 24.29 trillion current LCU against 11.74 trillion current LCU in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Chile and Lebanon?
12.55 trillion current LCU, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lebanon?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Chile and Lebanon rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Chile ranks 24th and Lebanon ranks 21st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Lebanon: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/chile/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/chile/lebanon/">Chile vs Lebanon: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.