Chile vs China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Chile
11.74 trillion current LCU
in 2025
China
9.33 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Chile rank
24th
China rank
27th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Chile
  • China
02.5T5.0T7.5T10.0T12.5T196019922025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 11.74 trillion current LCU against 9.33 trillion current LCU in China, a difference of 2.40 trillion current LCU.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times China's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was China ahead.

Chile ranks 24th and China ranks 27th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile China Difference Ahead
1960s 1.95 million current LCU 58.21 billion current LCU 58.21 billion current LCU China
1970s 14.16 billion current LCU 94.58 billion current LCU 80.42 billion current LCU China
1980s 264.06 billion current LCU 254.93 billion current LCU 9.13 billion current LCU Chile
1990s 1.65 trillion current LCU 1.02 trillion current LCU 634.54 billion current LCU Chile
2000s 2.61 trillion current LCU 2.23 trillion current LCU 376.54 billion current LCU Chile
2010s 5.90 trillion current LCU 5.56 trillion current LCU 339.02 billion current LCU Chile
2020s 9.71 trillion current LCU 8.73 trillion current LCU 978.84 billion current LCU Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Chile or China?
Chile, at 11.74 trillion current LCU against 9.33 trillion current LCU in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Chile and China?
2.40 trillion current LCU, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and China?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Chile and China rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Chile ranks 24th and China ranks 27th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/chile/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/chile/china/">Chile vs China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.