Burundi vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Burundi
6.16 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Russian Federation
6.55 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Burundi rank
32nd
Russian Federation rank
30th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Burundi
  • Russian Federation
02.0T4.0T6.0T197019972025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 6.55 trillion current LCU against 6.16 trillion current LCU in Burundi, a difference of 394.85 billion current LCU.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 32nd and Russian Federation ranks 30th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1980s 83.28 billion current LCU 89.40 million current LCU 83.20 billion current LCU Burundi
1990s 129.90 billion current LCU 86.81 billion current LCU 43.09 billion current LCU Burundi
2000s 478.46 billion current LCU 946.02 billion current LCU 467.56 billion current LCU Russian Federation
2010s 1.57 trillion current LCU 2.74 trillion current LCU 1.17 trillion current LCU Russian Federation
2020s 3.94 trillion current LCU 5.39 trillion current LCU 1.44 trillion current LCU Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Burundi or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 6.55 trillion current LCU against 6.16 trillion current LCU in Burundi as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Burundi and Russian Federation?
394.85 billion current LCU, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Russian Federation?
37 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
How do Burundi and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Burundi ranks 32nd and Russian Federation ranks 30th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/burundi/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/burundi/russian-federation/">Burundi vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.