Burkina Faso vs Türkiye: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Burkina Faso
3.21 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Türkiye
3.28 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
47th
Türkiye rank
45th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Türkiye
01.0T2.0T3.0T196019922025

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 3.28 trillion current LCU against 3.21 trillion current LCU in Burkina Faso, a difference of 76.83 billion current LCU.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 47th and Türkiye ranks 45th of 206 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Türkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 36.36 billion current LCU 52,690 current LCU 36.36 billion current LCU Burkina Faso
1970s 64.02 billion current LCU 267,490 current LCU 64.02 billion current LCU Burkina Faso
1980s 186.32 billion current LCU 10.34 million current LCU 186.31 billion current LCU Burkina Faso
1990s 390.75 billion current LCU 2.94 billion current LCU 387.81 billion current LCU Burkina Faso
2000s 791.33 billion current LCU 52.54 billion current LCU 738.79 billion current LCU Burkina Faso
2010s 1.57 trillion current LCU 164.15 billion current LCU 1.41 trillion current LCU Burkina Faso
2020s 2.43 trillion current LCU 1.57 trillion current LCU 859.88 billion current LCU Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Burkina Faso or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 3.28 trillion current LCU against 3.21 trillion current LCU in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Burkina Faso and Türkiye?
76.83 billion current LCU, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Türkiye?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Türkiye rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Burkina Faso ranks 47th and Türkiye ranks 45th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Türkiye: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/burkina-faso/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/burkina-faso/turkiye/">Burkina Faso vs Türkiye: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.