Brazil vs Guinea-Bissau: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Brazil
775.30 billion current LCU
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
597.68 billion current LCU
in 2025
Brazil rank
61st
Guinea-Bissau rank
64th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Brazil
  • Guinea-Bissau
0200.0B400.0B600.0B800.0B196019922025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 775.30 billion current LCU against 597.68 billion current LCU in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 177.62 billion current LCU.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Brazil ranks 61st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 64th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current LCU 78.15 million current LCU 78.15 million current LCU Guinea-Bissau
1980s 3,939 current LCU 1.56 billion current LCU 1.56 billion current LCU Guinea-Bissau
1990s 25.04 billion current LCU 81.29 billion current LCU 56.25 billion current LCU Guinea-Bissau
2000s 103.62 billion current LCU 129.10 billion current LCU 25.48 billion current LCU Guinea-Bissau
2010s 252.98 billion current LCU 238.51 billion current LCU 14.47 billion current LCU Brazil
2020s 619.84 billion current LCU 475.41 billion current LCU 144.43 billion current LCU Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Brazil or Guinea-Bissau?
Brazil, at 775.30 billion current LCU against 597.68 billion current LCU in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Brazil and Guinea-Bissau?
177.62 billion current LCU, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guinea-Bissau?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Brazil ranks 61st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 64th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Guinea-Bissau: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/brazil/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/brazil/guinea-bissau/">Brazil vs Guinea-Bissau: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.