Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.46 billion current LCU
in 2025
Panama
2.37 billion current LCU
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
151st
Panama rank
154th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Panama
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B197019972025

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2.46 billion current LCU against 2.37 billion current LCU in Panama, a difference of 94.79 million current LCU.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 151st and Panama ranks 154th of 206 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 927.27 million current LCU 662.46 million current LCU 264.81 million current LCU Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 1.44 billion current LCU 943.93 million current LCU 500.01 million current LCU Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.78 billion current LCU 1.49 billion current LCU 293.54 million current LCU Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 2.24 billion current LCU 2.07 billion current LCU 168.86 million current LCU Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Panama?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2.46 billion current LCU against 2.37 billion current LCU in Panama as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama?
94.79 million current LCU, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama?
32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 151st and Panama ranks 154th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/bosnia-and-herzegovina/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/bosnia-and-herzegovina/panama/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.