Belgium vs Botswana: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Belgium
4.69 billion current LCU
in 2025
Botswana
4.79 billion current LCU
in 2025
Belgium rank
140th
Botswana rank
139th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Belgium
  • Botswana
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B196019922025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 4.79 billion current LCU against 4.69 billion current LCU in Belgium, a difference of 104.99 million current LCU.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 140th and Botswana ranks 139th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Botswana Difference Ahead
1990s 2.83 billion current LCU 650.38 million current LCU 2.18 billion current LCU Belgium
2000s 2.83 billion current LCU 1.09 billion current LCU 1.74 billion current LCU Belgium
2010s 3.08 billion current LCU 2.78 billion current LCU 298.91 million current LCU Belgium
2020s 4.11 billion current LCU 4.22 billion current LCU 108.05 million current LCU Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Belgium or Botswana?
Botswana, at 4.79 billion current LCU against 4.69 billion current LCU in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Belgium and Botswana?
104.99 million current LCU, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Botswana?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Botswana rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Belgium ranks 140th and Botswana ranks 139th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Botswana: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/belgium/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/belgium/botswana/">Belgium vs Botswana: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.