Bangladesh vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Bangladesh
6.30 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Russian Federation
6.55 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
31st
Russian Federation rank
30th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Russian Federation
02.0T4.0T6.0T196019922025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 6.55 trillion current LCU against 6.30 trillion current LCU in Bangladesh, a difference of 250.35 billion current LCU.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 31st and Russian Federation ranks 30th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1980s 282.36 billion current LCU 89.40 million current LCU 282.27 billion current LCU Bangladesh
1990s 414.46 billion current LCU 86.81 billion current LCU 327.65 billion current LCU Bangladesh
2000s 827.62 billion current LCU 946.02 billion current LCU 118.40 billion current LCU Russian Federation
2010s 2.34 trillion current LCU 2.74 trillion current LCU 404.20 billion current LCU Russian Federation
2020s 4.87 trillion current LCU 5.39 trillion current LCU 520.87 billion current LCU Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Bangladesh or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 6.55 trillion current LCU against 6.30 trillion current LCU in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Bangladesh and Russian Federation?
250.35 billion current LCU, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Russian Federation?
37 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Bangladesh ranks 31st and Russian Federation ranks 30th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/bangladesh/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/bangladesh/russian-federation/">Bangladesh vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.