Australia vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Australia
62.99 billion current LCU
in 2025
Guatemala
90.46 billion current LCU
in 2025
Australia rank
94th
Guatemala rank
92nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Australia
  • Guatemala
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B100.0B196519952025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 90.46 billion current LCU against 62.99 billion current LCU in Australia, a difference of 27.47 billion current LCU.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.4 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 94th and Guatemala ranks 92nd of 206 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 16.04 billion current LCU 19.83 billion current LCU 3.80 billion current LCU Guatemala
2000s 26.05 billion current LCU 27.54 billion current LCU 1.49 billion current LCU Guatemala
2010s 38.14 billion current LCU 46.27 billion current LCU 8.13 billion current LCU Guatemala
2020s 55.76 billion current LCU 73.68 billion current LCU 17.92 billion current LCU Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Australia or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 90.46 billion current LCU against 62.99 billion current LCU in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Australia and Guatemala?
27.47 billion current LCU, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Australia ranks 94th and Guatemala ranks 92nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/australia/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/australia/guatemala/">Australia vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.