Australia vs Canada: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Australia
62.99 billion current LCU
in 2025
Canada
55.36 billion current LCU
in 2022
Australia rank
94th
Canada rank
97th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
20.0B40.0B60.0B199020072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 62.99 billion current LCU against 55.36 billion current LCU in Canada, a difference of 7.63 billion current LCU.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Canada ahead.

Australia ranks 94th and Canada ranks 97th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Canada in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
1990s 18.27 billion current LCU 22.13 billion current LCU 3.86 billion current LCU Canada
2000s 26.05 billion current LCU 25.14 billion current LCU 911.80 million current LCU Australia
2010s 38.14 billion current LCU 34.96 billion current LCU 3.17 billion current LCU Australia
2020s 50.25 billion current LCU 45.58 billion current LCU 4.67 billion current LCU Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Australia or Canada?
Australia, at 62.99 billion current LCU against 55.36 billion current LCU in Canada as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Australia and Canada?
7.63 billion current LCU, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Australia ranks 94th and Canada ranks 97th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.