Argentina vs Paraguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Argentina
46.90 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Paraguay
43.28 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Argentina rank
12th
Paraguay rank
14th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Argentina
  • Paraguay
010.0T20.0T30.0T40.0T50.0T196219932025

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 46.90 trillion current LCU against 43.28 trillion current LCU in Paraguay, a difference of 3.61 trillion current LCU.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Paraguay ahead.

Argentina ranks 12th and Paraguay ranks 14th of 206 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0789 current LCU 21.18 billion current LCU 21.18 billion current LCU Paraguay
1970s 23.82 current LCU 66.46 billion current LCU 66.46 billion current LCU Paraguay
1980s 32.51 million current LCU 429.68 billion current LCU 429.65 billion current LCU Paraguay
1990s 12.93 billion current LCU 2.74 trillion current LCU 2.73 trillion current LCU Paraguay
2000s 44.96 billion current LCU 8.11 trillion current LCU 8.07 trillion current LCU Paraguay
2010s 412.95 billion current LCU 20.15 trillion current LCU 19.74 trillion current LCU Paraguay
2020s 17.09 trillion current LCU 34.39 trillion current LCU 17.29 trillion current LCU Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Argentina or Paraguay?
Argentina, at 46.90 trillion current LCU against 43.28 trillion current LCU in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Argentina and Paraguay?
3.61 trillion current LCU, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Paraguay?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Argentina and Paraguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Argentina ranks 12th and Paraguay ranks 14th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Paraguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/argentina/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu/argentina/paraguay/">Argentina vs Paraguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 9,111 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.