Mauritania vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Mauritania
7.94 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sierra Leone
6.69 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mauritania rank
67th
Sierra Leone rank
69th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Mauritania
  • Sierra Leone
02468196119932025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 7.94 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 6.69 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1.25 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Sierra Leone's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 67th and Sierra Leone ranks 69th of 206 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 1.21 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.21 current LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1970s 1.1 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.1 current LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1980s 1.45 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0064 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.45 current LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1990s 3.51 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.4093 current LCU per US$ of GDP 3.1 current LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2000s 5.53 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.05 current LCU per US$ of GDP 4.48 current LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2010s 6.22 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.88 current LCU per US$ of GDP 4.34 current LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2020s 7.42 current LCU per US$ of GDP 5.2 current LCU per US$ of GDP 2.22 current LCU per US$ of GDP Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Mauritania or Sierra Leone?
Mauritania, at 7.94 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 6.69 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Sierra Leone as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Mauritania and Sierra Leone?
1.25 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sierra Leone?
62 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
How do Mauritania and Sierra Leone rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Mauritania ranks 67th and Sierra Leone ranks 69th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritania/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritania/sierra-leone/">Mauritania vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,092 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.