Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Malawi
525.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
582.13 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Malawi rank
18th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
16th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Malawi
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0200400600198020022025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 582.13 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 525.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 56.34 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 18th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 206 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 3.86 current LCU per US$ of GDP 138.83 current LCU per US$ of GDP 134.97 current LCU per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 29.45 current LCU per US$ of GDP 271.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP 242.48 current LCU per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 109.26 current LCU per US$ of GDP 502.8 current LCU per US$ of GDP 393.54 current LCU per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 344.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP 576.67 current LCU per US$ of GDP 231.88 current LCU per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Malawi or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 582.13 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 525.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
56.34 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Malawi ranks 18th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/malawi/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/malawi/tanzania/">Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,092 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.