Kiribati vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Kiribati
0.351 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2024
South Sudan
0.3732 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Kiribati rank
116th
South Sudan rank
114th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Kiribati
  • South Sudan
0.10.20.30.40.5197920012024

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0.3732 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.351 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0222 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 116th and South Sudan ranks 114th of 206 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.318 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1042 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2138 current LCU per US$ of GDP Kiribati
2010s 0.2654 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2209 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0445 current LCU per US$ of GDP Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Kiribati or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 0.3732 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.351 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Kiribati as of 2015.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Kiribati and South Sudan?
0.0222 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Sudan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do Kiribati and South Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Kiribati ranks 116th and South Sudan ranks 114th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/kiribati/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/kiribati/south-sudan/">Kiribati vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,092 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.