Cote d'Ivoire vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Cote d'Ivoire
97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pakistan
64.32 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
37th
Pakistan rank
39th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Pakistan
050100150196019922025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 64.32 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Pakistan, a difference of 33.23 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.5 times Pakistan's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 37th and Pakistan ranks 39th of 206 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 99.94 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.8 current LCU per US$ of GDP 98.14 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 67.19 current LCU per US$ of GDP 2.6 current LCU per US$ of GDP 64.59 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 90.02 current LCU per US$ of GDP 3.58 current LCU per US$ of GDP 86.44 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 97.43 current LCU per US$ of GDP 7.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP 89.88 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 96.62 current LCU per US$ of GDP 13.38 current LCU per US$ of GDP 83.25 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 90.96 current LCU per US$ of GDP 22.94 current LCU per US$ of GDP 68.02 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 96.84 current LCU per US$ of GDP 50.05 current LCU per US$ of GDP 46.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Cote d'Ivoire or Pakistan?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 64.32 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Cote d'Ivoire and Pakistan?
33.23 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Pakistan?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 37th and Pakistan ranks 39th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/cote-d-ivoire/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/cote-d-ivoire/pakistan/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,092 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.