Congo vs Côte d'Ivoire: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Congo
58.83 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Côte d'Ivoire
97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Congo rank
40th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
37th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Congo
  • Côte d'Ivoire
255075100125150196019922025

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 58.83 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 38.72 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.7 times Congo's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 40th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 37th of 206 countries.

Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Côte d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1960s 49.72 current LCU per US$ of GDP 99.94 current LCU per US$ of GDP 50.22 current LCU per US$ of GDP Côte d'Ivoire
1970s 37.73 current LCU per US$ of GDP 67.19 current LCU per US$ of GDP 29.47 current LCU per US$ of GDP Côte d'Ivoire
1980s 32.48 current LCU per US$ of GDP 90.02 current LCU per US$ of GDP 57.54 current LCU per US$ of GDP Côte d'Ivoire
1990s 45.41 current LCU per US$ of GDP 97.43 current LCU per US$ of GDP 52.02 current LCU per US$ of GDP Côte d'Ivoire
2000s 31.37 current LCU per US$ of GDP 96.62 current LCU per US$ of GDP 65.26 current LCU per US$ of GDP Côte d'Ivoire
2010s 29.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP 90.96 current LCU per US$ of GDP 61.03 current LCU per US$ of GDP Côte d'Ivoire
2020s 55.42 current LCU per US$ of GDP 96.84 current LCU per US$ of GDP 41.43 current LCU per US$ of GDP Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Congo or Côte d'Ivoire?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 58.83 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Congo and Côte d'Ivoire?
38.72 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Côte d'Ivoire?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Congo and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Congo ranks 40th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 37th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Côte d'Ivoire: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/cote-d-ivoire/">Congo vs Côte d'Ivoire: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,092 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.