Argentina vs Cote d'Ivoire: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Argentina
68.65 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire
97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Argentina rank
38th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
37th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Argentina
  • Cote d'Ivoire
050100150196019922025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 68.65 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Argentina, a difference of 28.9 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.4 times Argentina's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 38th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 37th of 206 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per US$ of GDP 89.98 current LCU per US$ of GDP 89.98 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 0 current LCU per US$ of GDP 67.19 current LCU per US$ of GDP 67.19 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 0.0004 current LCU per US$ of GDP 90.02 current LCU per US$ of GDP 90.02 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 0.0524 current LCU per US$ of GDP 97.43 current LCU per US$ of GDP 97.38 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 0.2079 current LCU per US$ of GDP 96.62 current LCU per US$ of GDP 96.42 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 0.7941 current LCU per US$ of GDP 90.96 current LCU per US$ of GDP 90.17 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 26.51 current LCU per US$ of GDP 96.84 current LCU per US$ of GDP 70.34 current LCU per US$ of GDP Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Argentina or Cote d'Ivoire?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 97.55 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 68.65 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Argentina as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Argentina and Cote d'Ivoire?
28.9 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cote d'Ivoire?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Argentina and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Argentina ranks 38th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 37th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Cote d'Ivoire: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/cote-d-ivoire/">Argentina vs Cote d'Ivoire: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 9,092 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.