Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Zambia
16,722 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20,074 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia rank
189th
Zimbabwe rank
186th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 20,074 current LCU per square kilometre against 16,722 current LCU per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 3,352 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Zambia ranks 189th and Zimbabwe ranks 186th of 203 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Zambia averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Zambia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1645 current LCU per square kilometre 0.2925 current LCU per square kilometre 0.128 current LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.3237 current LCU per square kilometre 0.6403 current LCU per square kilometre 0.3166 current LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 3.13 current LCU per square kilometre 1.09 current LCU per square kilometre 2.03 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 709.43 current LCU per square kilometre 1.17 current LCU per square kilometre 708.26 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 6,742 current LCU per square kilometre 1.02 current LCU per square kilometre 6,741 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 14,321 current LCU per square kilometre 9.67 current LCU per square kilometre 14,312 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 17,110 current LCU per square kilometre 6,201 current LCU per square kilometre 10,909 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Zambia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 20,074 current LCU per square kilometre against 16,722 current LCU per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
3,352 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Zambia ranks 189th and Zimbabwe ranks 186th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/zambia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/zambia/zimbabwe/">Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.