Singapore vs Tuvalu: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Singapore
276,184 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
259,967 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2015
Singapore rank
114th
Tuvalu rank
116th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Singapore
  • Tuvalu
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 276,184 current LCU per square kilometre against 259,967 current LCU per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 16,217 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 114th and Tuvalu ranks 116th of 203 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1990s 277,642 current LCU per square kilometre 121,452 current LCU per square kilometre 156,190 current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 173,904 current LCU per square kilometre 202,915 current LCU per square kilometre 29,011 current LCU per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 181,861 current LCU per square kilometre 276,673 current LCU per square kilometre 94,812 current LCU per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Singapore or Tuvalu?
Singapore, at 276,184 current LCU per square kilometre against 259,967 current LCU per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Singapore and Tuvalu?
16,217 current LCU per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tuvalu?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Singapore and Tuvalu rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Singapore ranks 114th and Tuvalu ranks 116th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Tuvalu: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/tuvalu/">Singapore vs Tuvalu: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.