Romania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Romania
229,830 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
275,370 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
118th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
115th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Romania
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196619942023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 275,370 current LCU per square kilometre against 229,830 current LCU per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 45,540 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Romania ranks 118th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 115th of 203 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 9,464 current LCU per square kilometre 132,893 current LCU per square kilometre 123,429 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 102,856 current LCU per square kilometre 127,090 current LCU per square kilometre 24,234 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 151,819 current LCU per square kilometre 249,753 current LCU per square kilometre 97,934 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 221,450 current LCU per square kilometre 285,458 current LCU per square kilometre 64,008 current LCU per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Romania or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 275,370 current LCU per square kilometre against 229,830 current LCU per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Romania and Trinidad and Tobago?
45,540 current LCU per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Trinidad and Tobago?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Romania and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Romania ranks 118th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 115th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/romania/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/romania/trinidad-and-tobago/">Romania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.