Panama vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per

Panama
28,204 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
24,028 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
177th
East Timor rank
180th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per over time

  • Panama
  • East Timor
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 28,204 current LCU per square kilometre against 24,028 current LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 4,176 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 177th and East Timor ranks 180th of 203 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 12,697 current LCU per square kilometre 9,418 current LCU per square kilometre 3,280 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2010s 20,028 current LCU per square kilometre 18,541 current LCU per square kilometre 1,487 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2020s 26,021 current LCU per square kilometre 21,683 current LCU per square kilometre 4,338 current LCU per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per, Panama or East Timor?
Panama, at 28,204 current LCU per square kilometre against 24,028 current LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per between Panama and East Timor?
4,176 current LCU per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and East Timor?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Panama and East Timor rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current lcu), per?
Panama ranks 177th and East Timor ranks 180th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/panama/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/panama/timor-leste/">Panama vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.